Trends in Writing Assessment Research in Indonesia: A Bibliometric Study

Authors

  • Festif Rudolf Hoinbala Universitas Kristen Artha Wacana
  • Polce Yulian Mola SMA Negeri 5 Kupang
  • Dorkas Anomi Johannis SMK Negeri 1 Kupang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33323/l.v3i1.65

Abstract

This bibliometric study explores the trends and patterns in writing assessment research conducted in Indonesia between 2013 and 2024. Employing a systematic approach, data were collected from Scopus and Google Scholar databases using targeted keywords related to writing assessment and the Indonesian EFL context. One hundred twenty-three publications meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed using bibliometric tools such as VOSviewer to visualize thematic clusters, publication productivity, and collaboration networks. The findings reveal a steady increase in research output, especially after introducing major educational reforms like Kurikulum 2013 and Merdeka Belajar. Key thematic areas identified include formative assessment practices, integrating technology and AI-based writing feedback tools, rubric development aligned with national qualification frameworks, and assessing higher-order thinking skills. Collaboration analysis shows a growing network of researchers and institutions contributing to improving writing assessment knowledge in Indonesia. Despite these advances, gaps remain in methodological diversity, dissemination in local languages, and stronger links between research and classroom practice. The study highlights the need for enhanced professional development and policy support to foster effective, context-sensitive writing assessment practices. Limitations include potential exclusion of grey literature and the evolving nature of citation metrics. Recommendations for future research emphasize mixed-method approaches, expanded data sources, and closer researcher-practitioner collaboration. This study offers valuable insights for scholars, educators, and policymakers aiming to improve writing assessment frameworks and ultimately enhance students’ writing competence in Indonesian EFL settings.

References

Ambarwati, R., Nugroho, B. S., & Widodo, H. P. (2022). Future trends in academic writing assessment in Indonesia: A framework for post-pandemic classrooms. Journal of Language and Education, 8(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.12464

Andayani, A., Suherdi, D., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2023). Investigating EFL teachers’ preparedness in implementing higher-order thinking skills assessment in writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i1.42823

Anugerahwati, M., Mukminatien, N., & Fauzan, U. (2024). The effectiveness of AI-supported feedback on EFL students’ writing performance in Indonesia. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 4(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.24036/jeti.v4i1.576

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Astuti, E. W., Ardi, P., & Mulyono, H. (2022). Online formative assessment during emergency remote teaching: Challenges and teacher strategies. International Journal of Language Education, 6(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i2.32245

Barkaoui, K. (2020). Second language writing assessment and feedback. Routledge.

Boeriswati, E., Mustadi, A., & Amalia, A. (2023). Development and validation of KKNI-based writing rubrics for Indonesian higher education. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijert.v3i1.44280

Council of Europe. (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (Companion Volume). Council of Europe Publishing.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Fauzan, U., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2023). Indonesian EFL teachers’ perceptions of AI-based writing feedback tools: A case study. TEFLIN Journal, 34(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i1/13-30

Gunawan, G., Herayanti, L., & Rahmatiah, R. (2020). Peer assessment in enhancing EFL learners' writing achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13319a

Habibie, P., & Brianto, D. (2022). Digital platforms for EFL writing assessment in Indonesian higher education: A case study. Asian EFL Journal, 24(3), 112–130.

Habibie, P., & Hyland, K. (2023). Digital writing in Southeast Asia: Challenges and opportunities in higher education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101121

Hapsari, R. P., Rasyid, Y., & Sukirlan, M. (2023). Grammarly feedback on students’ academic writing: Benefits and drawbacks. Indonesian EFL Journal, 9(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v9i2.7430

Hendrayana, A., Nurkamto, J., & Suparno. (2021). Developing analytic rubrics for assessing digital writing tasks in EFL classrooms. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14329a

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27(1), 1–12. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2019). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Kemendikbud. (2019). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2018 tentang Standar Isi, Proses, dan Penilaian. Kemendikbud.

Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2020). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002

Mulyanah, A., Kurniawan, D., & Fauzan, U. (2023). The use of AI-assisted writing tools in Indonesian EFL classrooms: Teachers’ perspectives and practices. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(4), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.21009/jot.v15i4.457

Newman, M. (2018). Networks (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Putri, A. P., & Yufiarti. (2021). The effect of digital peer assessment using Google Classroom on students’ essay writing skills. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i1.35923

Rahmawati, I., Yuliasri, I., & Anugerahwati, M. (2021). Emergency remote writing assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and strategies. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 678–696. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.19560

Rakhmani, I., & Siregar, F. (2022). Educational technology research trends in Indonesia: A bibliometric analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10683-3

Ramos-Rodríguez, A. R., Ruíz-Navarro, J., & Sánchez-Cañizares, S. M. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of research publications on teaching and learning in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 46(1), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1678854

Rohman, A., & Yusuf, Y. Q. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of AI-assisted writing assessment tools in Indonesian EFL classrooms. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(5), 216–228. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i05.28199

Rustam, R., & Priyanto, P. (2022). Assessing higher-order thinking skills in Indonesian EFL students’ scientific writing. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 26(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v26i1.43678

Sari, P. M., & Marlina, L. (2021). The impact of self-assessment on students’ writing achievement. Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(2), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v10i2.112708

Setiyadi, A. B., Mahpul, & Wicaksono, B. (2021). Mixed-methods research in language assessment: Patterns and challenges in Indonesia. TESOL International Journal, 16(2), 98–115.

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2019). VOSviewer manual. University of Leiden. https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.16.pdf

Yanti, D. R., Cahyono, B. Y., & Prayogo, J. A. (2022). Enhancing EFL students’ writing performance through peer-assessment strategies in online learning. LEKSIKA: Journal of Language, Literature, and Teaching, 16(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.30595/lks.v16i1.9992

Yuliasri, I., Maharani, S., & Rahmawati, I. (2022). Research collaboration trends in language education in Indonesia: A bibliometric mapping. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.42519

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Gellert, A. S., Arnbak, E., Wischmann, S., & Elbro, C. (2021). Morphological intervention for students with limited vocabulary knowledge: Short‐and long‐term transfer effects. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(3), 583-601.

Ghozali, I. (2015). LiAplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hermawan, I. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Mixed Method. Hidayatul Quran Kuningan.

Lieber, R. (2021). Introducing Morphology. Cambridge University Press.

McCutchen, D. & B. Logan (2011). Inside Incidental Word Learning: Children's Strategic Use of Morphological Information to Infer Word Meanings. Reading Research Quarterly. 46(4), p. 334–349. DOI: 10.1002/RRQ.003

Nafiah, H. A. (2017). The Correlation Between Students' morphological Awareness of Affixes to Their Reading Comprehension (A Study of Fifth Semester Students of English Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty at IAIN Salatiga in Academic Year of 2016/2017) (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN Salatiga).

O’Grady, W., & de Cuzman, V. P. (1997). Morphology: the analysis of word structure. In W. O’Grady, M. Dobrovolsky, F. Katamba (Eds). (1997). Contemporary linguistics: an introduction (132–180). London: Longman.

Priyatno, D. (2016). Belajar Alat Analisis Data Dan Cara Pengolahannya Dengan SPSS Praktis dan Mudah Dipahami untuk Tingkat Pemula dan Menengah. Gava Media.

Rohmatillah, R. (2017). A Study on Difficulties in Learning Vocabulary. English Education: Jurnal Tadris bahasa Inggris, 6(1), 75- 93.

Santoso, Slamet. (2013). Statistika Ekonomi Plus Aplikasi SPSS. Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo Press.

Schreuder, R., & Baayan, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131–154).

Shadikah, Arina Afiyati., Fauziati, Endang., and Supriyadi, Slamet. (2017) The Effect of Vocabulary Learning Strategies on Vocabulary Mastery Based On Gender Differences. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Arts, Language, And Culture. Published journal.

Siregar, S. (2015). Statistika Parametrik Untuk Penelitian Kuantitatif Dilengkapi Dengan Perhitungan Manual dan Aplikasi SPSS Versi 17. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung:

Alfabeta.

Yücel-Koç, M. (2015). The Role of Morphological Awareness in Academic Vocabulary and Reading Comprehension Skills of Adult ESL Learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Seattle Pacific University, Seattle.

Zamzami, M. F. (2019). The Effect of Using Duolingo Application Through Students' Vocabulary Mastery (Bachelor's thesis), Jakarta: FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-29